casestudy+rubric


 * Evaluation Rubric: GROUP CASE STUDY**
 * 1. CONTENT ( ** applies to **Presentation** plus **Written report)**
 * || ** LEVEL 4 ** || ** LEVEL 3 ** || ** LEVEL 2 ** || ** LEVEL 1 ** ||
 * ** Identification of the Main Issues/ Problems ** || Identifies & understands all of the main issues in the case study || Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study || Identifies and understands some of the issues in the case study || Identifies and understands few of the issues in case study ||
 * =====**Analysis of the Issues**===== || Insightful and thorough analysis of all the issues || Thorough analysis of most of the issues || Superficial analysis of some of the issues in the case || Incomplete analysis of the issues ||
 * =====**Comments on effective solutions/strategies (The solution may be in the case already or proposed by you)**===== || Well documented, reasoned and pedagogically appropriate comments on solutions, or proposals for solutions, to all issues in the case study || Appropriate, well thought out comments about solutions, or proposals for solutions, to most of the issues in the case study || Superficial and/or inappropriate solutions to some of the issues in the case study || Little or no action suggested, and/or inappropriate solutions to all of the issues in the case study ||
 * ** Links to Course Readings and Additional Research ** || Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings || Good research and documented links to the material read || Limited research and documented links to any readings || Incomplete research and links to any readings ||
 * 2. PRESENTATION **
 * || || ** LEVEL 4 ** || ** LEVEL 3 ** || ** LEVEL 2 ** || ** LEVEL 1 ** ||
 * || ====**Delivery and Enthusiasm**==== || Very clear and concise flow of ideas.

Demonstrates passionate interest in the topic and engagement with the class. || Clear flow of ideas

Demonstrates interest in topic and engagement with the class. || Most ideas flow but focus is lost at times

Limited evidence of interest in and engagement with the topic || Hard to follow the flow of ideas.

Lack of enthusiasm and interest. ||
 * || ** Visuals ** || Visuals augmented and extended comprehension of the issues in unique ways || Use of visuals related to the material || Limited use of visuals loosely related to the material || No use of visuals. ||
 * ** Involvement of the class: **
 * -Questions **
 * -Generating discussion **
 * -Activities ** || Excellent and salient discussion points that elucidated material to develop deep understanding

Appropriate and imaginative activities used to extend understanding in a creative manner || Questions and discussion addressed important information that developed understanding

Appropriate activities used to clarify understanding || Questions and discussion addressed surface features of the topic

Limited use of activities to clarify understanding || Little or no attempt to engage the class in learning ||
 * ** Response to Class Queries **

|| Excellent response to student comments and discussion with appropriate content supported by theory/research || Good response to class questions and discussion with some connection made to theory/research || Satisfactory response to class questions and discussion with limited reference to theory and research || Limited response to questions and discussion with no reference to theory/research ||